Legal Opinion

Simpson v. MSA of Myrtle Beach, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 2007No. 26293PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

This case arises out of an arbitration clause in an automobile trade-in contract between an automobile dealership and a customer. The automobile dealership filed a motion for protective order and/or to stay and to compel arbitration in response to the customer’s civil action. The trial court denied the dealership’s motion on the grounds that the arbitration clause was unconscionable. This appeal followed.

Factual/Procedural Background

Appellant MSA of Myrtle Beach, Inc d/b/a Addy’s Harbor Dodge (“Addy”), a car dealership, and Respondent Sherry H. Simpson (“Simpson”) entered…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Lacy Barras v. Branch Banking and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Dean v. Heritage Healthcare of Ridgeway, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Maybank v. BB&T Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  5. Bradley v. Brentwood Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API