Legal Opinion
Maybank v. BB&T Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 3, 2016No. Appellate Case 2014-002638; Opinion 27640PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HEARN:
This appeal arises from a total verdict of $17,199,306 rendered in favor of Francis P. Maybank for claims sounding in contract, tort, and the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA). Maybank brought this action alleging he received faulty investment advice from Branch Banking and Trust (BB&T) Company (the Bank) through BB&T Wealth Management (Wealth Management) and BB&T Asset Management (Asset Management), all operating under the corporate umbrella of BB&T Corporation (collectively, Appellants). Appellants appeal on numerous grounds, and Maybank appeals the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Linda Hamilton, Individually and as of the Estate of George Hamilton v. Atlas Turner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Continental Bank, N.A. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Patton ex rel. Alexia L. v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- 9855 Abernathy Owner, LLC v. Gibbs International, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.