Legal Opinion

Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1998No. 97-1670PublishedCited by 248 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

This appeal presents four principal issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court properly denied ITT’s motion to compel arbitration; (2) the propriety of the grounds for Williams’s recovery against ITT, under a theory of civil conspiracy, upheld by the court of appeals; (3) whether ITT was found derivatively liable for punitive damages based on a third party’s violations of the CSPA and HSSA; and (4) whether punitive damages were improperly assessed, and whether the amount of punitive damages awarded is so excessive that a due process violation occurred. For the following reasons, after *471…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by248 opinions

  1. Stout v. J.D. ByriderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hayes v. Oakridge HomeOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Brenda Bickerstaff v. Vincent LucarelliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001

243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API