Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
This appeal presents four principal issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court properly denied ITT’s motion to compel arbitration; (2) the propriety of the grounds for Williams’s recovery against ITT, under a theory of civil conspiracy, upheld by the court of appeals; (3) whether ITT was found derivatively liable for punitive damages based on a third party’s violations of the CSPA and HSSA; and (4) whether punitive damages were improperly assessed, and whether the amount of punitive damages awarded is so excessive that a due process violation occurred. For the following reasons, after *471…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by248 opinions
- Stout v. J.D. ByriderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Hayes v. Oakridge HomeOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Brenda Bickerstaff v. Vincent LucarelliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.