Legal Opinion

Herron v. CENTURY BMW

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 19, 2011No. 26805PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

This case returns to us on remand from the United States Supreme Court to reconsider our opinion in Herron v. Century BMW 1 in light of its decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. 2 Because the issue of preemption was not preserved for review in the South Carolina proceedings, we reinstate our initial opinion.

I

The underlying action originally came before this Court on appeal of the trial court’s denial of Appellant Century BMW’s motion to compel arbitration. We affirmed in result the trial court’s denial of the motion to compel. 3

Following our decision, Appellant filed a petition for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Cardinale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Pertuis v. Front Roe Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  3. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  4. Gibson v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. CopeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API