Legal Opinion
Boretti v. Panacea Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 4, 2001No. AC 19482PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
In this personal injury action, the plaintiff Helen Boretti1 appeals from the judgment in favor of the defendants2 following a jury trial. On appeal, *225the plaintiff claims that (1) the trial court improperly restricted her from questioning witnesses about the general condition of the defendants’ property, (2) the trial court improperly refused to charge the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, (3) this court should abandon the specific defect rule used in determining whether there is a breach of a duty owed to business invitees and (4) the trial court improperly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cruz v. DrezekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- New London Federal Savings Bank v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Monahan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. ColonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- James v. Valley-Shore Y.M.C.A., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. CollinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Whitaker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.