Legal Opinion
Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 8, 2000No. SC 16175PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The plaintiff, Clarence O. God-win, brought this action against the defendants, Dan-bury Eye Physicians and Surgeons, P.C., and a physician employed by it, Vincent S. Reppucci, alleging, in four counts: (1) assault and battery; (2) lack of informed consent; (3) medical malpractice; and (4) res ipsa loquitur. The plaintiffs allegations arose out of laser eye treatment administered by Reppucci.1 The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after a jury verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly: (1) directed a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Matthiessen v. VanechSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.