Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 2, 2005No. AC 24485PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The petitioner, Darryl Whitaker, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting him partial relief on his claim that the respondent, the commissioner of correction, miscalculated various credits on his criminal sentence. On appeal, the petitioner’s numerous statutory and constitutional claims1 can be sorted into two categories of claimed error. The petitioner contends that the court improperly concluded that (1) the respondent properly construed and applied General Statutes § 18-98d and did not violate his constitutional rights to equal protection and due process,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Ernesto Quintieri, Carlo DonatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. State v. NixonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Santana v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Martinez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API