Legal Opinion

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 2014No. G048820PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

Clean Energy Fuels Coip. (Clean Energy) has filed petitions for writ of review to challenge the Public Utilities Commission’s (PUC) decisions approving Southern California Gas Company’s (SoCalGas) application for a “Compression Services Tariff.” Under the tariff, SoCalGas would design, build, own, operate, and maintain equipment on nonresidential customers’ property to compress, store, and dispense natural gas above standard line pressure for customer end-use applications, including natural gas vehicle refueling, combined heat and power facilities, and peaking powerplants.

Cle…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rio Vista Farm Bureau Center v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. Public Util. Com.California Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Habitat & Watershed Caretakers v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. San Pablo Bay Pipeline Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Ponderosa Tel. Co. v. Cal. Pub. Utilities Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. City and County of S.F. v. Public Utilities Com.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Davis v. Southern Cal. EdisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. CAPUCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API