Legal Opinion

T-Mobile West LLC v. City and County of S.F.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2019No. S238001PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Corrigan, J.

*1113 By ordinance the City and County of San Francisco (the City) requires wireless telephone service companies to obtain permits to *1114 install and maintain lines and equipment in public rights-of-way. Some permits will not issue unless the application conforms to the City's established *415 aesthetic guidelines. Plaintiffs assert a facial challenge urging that (1) the ordinance is preempted by state law and (2) even if not preempted, the ordinance violates a state statute. The trial court and the Court of Appeal rejected both arguments. We do likewise.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are telecommunications…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. BecerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. California Attorney General Opinion 25-902, California Attorney General Reports2026
  5. Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. Public Utilities Com.California Supreme Court · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API