Legal Opinion

Neverman and Plahn v. Bank of Cass County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the District Qourt of Grant County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Gillette,, J.:

This was an action commenced originally in the probate court of Grant county, Oklahoma Territory, and from there appealed to the district court of said county.

The petition states a cause of action upon a promissor3 note in words and figures as follows: ,

“On or before the 1st day of March, 190®, for value received, in one year 1, or we, the undersigned, living four miles southeast of Louisville post office, county of. State of Nebraska, promise to pay to Mrs. Lizzie McLain or order four hundred dollars at with interest from maturity at the rate of seven per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Thisler v. MackeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Erenberg v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. Slick Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Walker Drilling Co. v. Carlew Drilling ContractorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Early v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. G. S. Johnson Co. v. Nevada Packard Mines Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API