Legal Opinion

Thisler v. Mackey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1902No. 12,637PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Geary district court; O. L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dostbr, C. J. :

This was an action on a promissory note. The answer of the defendants admitted the execution of the note, but averred that it was given to *465evidence and secure part of the purchase-price of a horse sold by plaintiffs to defendants; that contemporaneously with the agreement to purchase and the execution of the note, and as part of the consideration for the transaction, the plaintiffs agreed that when the horse became four years old they would rescind the contract, if defendants so desired, and would accept a return of the animal, and would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Babcock v. D. Deford & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Trice v. YoemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  4. Walker v. PriceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. Dominion National Bank v. ManningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clark v. Slick Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. VanordstrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Gillis v. First Nat. Bank of FrederickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Elling v. Bank of JeffersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Fossan v. GibbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API