Legal Opinion
Erenberg v. Peters
California Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1884No. 8,461PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court
-Action to recover rent due on a written lease; defense, a substituted oral agreement.
On the 7th of January, 1874, plaintiffs leased to defendants, by a lease in writing, a lot of land for five years; and during the term defendants erected a building thereon. On the 7th of January, 1879, another lease was executed for a term from February 11,1879, to January 31, 1884. During the second term, to wit, January 27, 1881, the building was burned. An oral agreement was then made between plaintiffs and defendants, that the plaintiffs would erect another building on the lot, and that the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Thompson v. GornerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Cughan v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Neverman and Plahn v. Bank of Cass CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904