Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Ware
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Ellis County; T. P. Clay, Judge. _ Action by the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company against Lavin Ware and R. E. Tolliver. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.
The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company, instituted this action against the defendants in error, defendants below, Lavin Ware and R. E. Tolliver, to recover on a series of promissory notes aggregating the sum of $1.831.04. We will designate the parties as they appeared in the trial court.
The defendants in their answer admitted the execution and delivery of the notes sued on, and as a defense thereto alleged, in substance, that they had been induced by the plaintiff, through its agents, to purchase from the plaintiffs a Big 4 — 30, Model E, tractor,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Covington v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Brown v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Garfield Oil Co. v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Thompson v. KiesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Small v. ComerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- G. S. Johnson Co. v. Nevada Packard Mines Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.