Legal Opinion

Universal Ideas Corp. v. Esty

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 25, 1987No. 16-82-04580; CA A36594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiff alleges that defendant breached a non-competition provision in the parties’ contract. The case was tried to the court. At the close of plaintiffs case-in-chief, defendant moved to dismiss on the ground, inter alia, that the non-competition agreement was an impermissible restraint of trade. The trial court held that “[p]laintiff does not have a protectible interest justifying said restraint of trade” and “[t]here is no evidence whatsoever that anything that was transferred [by plaintiff to defendant] under the contract would be qualified as trade secret, or anything unique.” The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cribbs v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. ChamberlainOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Universal Ideas Corp. v. Linn County Ex Rel. RileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Oregon Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Grant County v. Arcanum Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Barnett v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Dean v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Dedman v. Albina Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API