Legal Opinion

Cribbs v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action for slander. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendants. Plaintiff has appealed from the consequent judgment.

The assignments of error upon which plaintiff mainly relies are all based upon rulings of the court sustaining objections to the introduction of certain testimony in rebuttal. In order to understand the issue thus raised it will be necessary to refer briefly to the pleadings and the evidence.

The complaint alleged that defendants

“spoke and published of and concerning plaintiff the false, scandalous and malicious words, following, to-wit:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Upton v. HumeOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Draper v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Kilgore v. KoenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Coates v. SlusherOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Prestbye v. KliphardtOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grubb v. JOHNSONOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Murphy v. HartyOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Universal Ideas Corp. v. EstyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Koch v. LaboricoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API