Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Oregon Holdings, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1998No. 9212-08520; CA A91783PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s allowance of judgment notwithstanding the verdict after a jury returned a verdict for plaintiff on her claims of wrongful discharge and unlawful discrimination under the “pregnancy discrimination” statutes, former ORS 659.360 to ORS 659.370 and former ORS 659.385 to ORS 659.393. We conclude that, on the record presented, plaintiffs assignments of error are unreviewable. Accordingly, we affirm.

The appellate record, as designated by plaintiff, does not include the trial transcript. Rather, plaintiff designated only the trial exhibits and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Universal Ideas Corp. v. EstyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Watts v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Grant County v. Arcanum Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. York v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Farhang v. KariminaserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Barnett v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API