Barnett v. City of Salem
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Plaintiff sued defendants under 42 USC section 1983 for violating her due process rights. Defendants prevailed at trial, and plaintiff appeals. Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion for a directed verdict. As explained below, we cannot review the assigned error because plaintiff failed to provide a sufficient appellate record. Plaintiff also assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion for a new trial. We reject that assignment without discussion. Accordingly, we affirm.
Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred by denying her motion for a directed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Universal Ideas Corp. v. EstyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Watts v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Abbott v. Oregon Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- Plum v. LibrandeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Oconnell v. CowgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012