Legal Opinion

Dean v. Guard Publishing Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1987No. 16-83-01564; CA A40926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

In Dean v. Guard Publishing Co., 73 Or App 656, 699 P2d 1158 (1985), we reversed the trial court’s judgment on the pleadings for defendant and remanded this “false light” action for trial. On remand, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs case. Plaintiff again appeals, assigning error to that ruling, and we again reverse.

In our earlier opinion, we held that the tort of false light is actionable in Oregon, and we adopted the test of liability stated in Restatment (Second) Torts, § 652E:

“One who gives publicity to a matter concerning another…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Dean v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Universal Ideas Corp. v. EstyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Lincoln County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. James River Corp. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API