Legal Opinion
Universal Ideas Corp. v. Linn County Ex Rel. Riley
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 5, 1983No. 80-0400; CA A23408PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
This is a negligence action against Linn County, arising out of the clerk’s failure to mail notice to plaintiff pursuant to former ORS 18.030, now ORCP 70B(1), that judgment had been entered against plaintiff in Universal Ideas Corporation v. Esty, a contract action. ORS 18.030 provided:
“All judgments shall be entered by the clerk in the journal. All judgments shall specify clearly the judgment debtor, judgment creditor, the amount to be recovered, the relief granted or other determination of the action. The clerk shall, on the date judgment is entered, mail a copy of the judgment and notice…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SpeerstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Junction City Water Control District v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Universal Ideas Corp. v. EstyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Universal Ideas Corp. v. EstyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Union Oil Co. v. Clackamas County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.