Legal Opinion

James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 25, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-30PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff James Julian, Inc. (“Julian”) seeks injunctive relief and damages against several labor organizations, individual union officers and Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”) and Raytheon Service Company (“RSC”) under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2), section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 187), and state tort law. The union defendants have moved to dismiss Counts I, II and VI for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. K. Kay Shearin v. The E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., E.F. Hutton & Company Inc. And E.F. Hutton Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
  3. James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
  4. James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API