Legal Opinion

Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 28, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 82-797, (Formerly California A. Nos. C83 0196, C83 0704)PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

1. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, Paul Kalmanovitz 1 (“Kalmanovitz”), individually and as a shareholder of Pabst Brewing Company (“Pabst”), and S & P, a California corporation (“S & P”) (collectively “plaintiffs”), brought this action on December 10, 1982, pursuant to (a) Sections 10(b), 13(e), 14(d), and 14(e) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78m(e), 78n(d), and 78n(e), and the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC thereunder; (b) Section 1 of the Sherman Act, Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 18; and (c) the laws of the State of…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Pennsylvania ex rel. Zimmerman v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Kenneth McClure Young, II v. Warren Kann and Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. K. Kay Shearin v. The E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., E.F. Hutton & Company Inc. And E.F. Hutton Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Elizabeth Harvey v. Peter LoftusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API