Legal Opinion

James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 31, 1984No. Civ. A. 80-30 MMSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge,

James Julian, Inc. (“Julian”), a construction contractor, brought this action to obtain relief from various union, non-union, and individual defendants under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2), under section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 187) and under state tort law. The non-union defendants, Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”) and Raytheon Service Company (“RSC”), 1 reached a settlement with Julian and have been dismissed from the action. 2 The remaining union defendants are: Building and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API