Legal Opinion

James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 16, 1983No. Civ. A. 80-30PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff, James Julian, Inc. (“Julian”), a subcontractor on a construction project known as the Delaware Reclamation Project (“Project”), instituted the current action in January 1980. Defendants are Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”), Raytheon Service Company (“RSC”), 1 various labor organizations, 2 and several named individuals. 3 Julian seeks injunctive relief and damages under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (“Sherman Act”), section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 187 (“LMRA”), and state tort…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nutt v. AC & S. CO., INC.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  2. In Re Asbestos LitigationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Carpet Group International v. Oriental Rug Importers Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  5. Wilk v. American Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API