Legal Opinion
McKitis v. Defazio
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 26, 1999No. Civ.A. No. S-98-3027PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant, Frank De-fazio’s, Motion to Compel Plaintiff, Joan McKitis, to submit to physical and mental examinations pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 35. (Paper No. 23). Plaintiff has filed an opposition and defendant a reply. (Paper Nos. 24 *227and 25).1 For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion is granted.
Plaintiff does not dispute that her physical and mental condition is in controversy. Rather, she argues that, because she already has submitted to one examination by an orthopedist, Dr. Cohen, Rule 35 precludes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Dziwanoski v. Ocean Carriers Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- United States v. Charles Maynard, United States of America v. Kermit N. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Warrick v. BrodeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Behler v. HanlonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Calderon v. Reederei Claus-Peter Offen GmbH & Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Sexton v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Ricks v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Sloan v. Cost-U-Less, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.