Legal Opinion

Ricks v. Abbott Laboratories

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 29, 2001No. CIV.A. No. WMN-00-1290PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BREDAR, United States Magistrate Judge.

On October 19, 2000, this case was referred to the undersigned for resolution of all discovery disputes (Paper No. 21). Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Strike, or, in the Alternative, to Compel Plaintiff to Submit to a Mental Examination (Paper No. 35). I have considered the parties’ submissions. No hearing is necessary. See D. MD. R. 105.6. For the reasons set forth below, I deny Defendant’s Motion to Strike, or, in the Alternative, to Compel Plaintiff to Submit to a Mental Examination. A separate Order will issue.

Facts

Plainti…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
  4. Fox v. Gates Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
  5. McKitis v. DefazioDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gepner v. Fujicolor Processing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stevenson v. Stanley Bostitch, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
  3. Díaz-Casillas v. Doctors' Ctr. Hosp. San JuanUnited States District Court · 2018
  4. Kennedy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Auer v. City of MinotDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API