Legal Opinion
In re Reichmann Land & Cattle, LLP
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 2014No. A13-1461PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Judge.
We affirm the order of respondent Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (the MPCA) requiring relator, Reichmann Land and Cattle, LLP, to obtain a State Disposal System permit for its winter cattle lands because the lands are *45not exempt from such a permit under the statutory definition of pasture. We reverse the commissioner’s order requiring a federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit because Reich-mann’s operation is not an animal feeding operation as defined under federal law.
FACTS
Reichmann operates a fifth-generation family farm in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of REICHMANN LAND AND CATTLE, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Marriage of Letsch v. LetschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987