Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 29, 2004No. A03-290PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
A police officer conducted a traffic stop of Matthew Anderson, the appellant, for violating Minn.Stat. § 169.18, subd. 11 (2002), which requires motorists to move “a lane away” from stopped emergency vehicles. During the stop, the officer obtained evidence that was used to charge Anderson with Impaired Driving in the Fourth Degree in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 169A.20, subd. 1(5), and 169A.27, subd. 1 (2002). Anderson moved to suppress the evidence, claiming that the police officer who stopped him lacked a “particularized and objective basis” for suspecting him of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. HeienSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Rita Ann Stevens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.