Legal Opinion

Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1987No. C3-86-1642PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MULALLY, Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial in a dissolution action. We affirm.

FACTS

The 25-year marriage of the parties was dissolved on July 7, 1986. Prior to the dissolution, there were two extended separations. At the time of trial, both parties were 46 years old, and all three children of the marriage were adults.

Both parties were employed throughout the marriage, except for approximately five years when respondent stayed home to care for the children. Respondent was employed as a nurse, and appellant as a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Ruzic v. RuzicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Ronnkvist v. RonnkvistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Marriage of Kostelnik v. KostelnikCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Skeim v. Independent School District No. 115Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Falk v. Hecker (In Re Falk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
  2. Marriage of Paul v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API