In the Matter of REICHMANN LAND AND CATTLE, LLP
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
The question presented by this case is whether a farm must obtain federal or state pollution discharge permits for using fields as cropland in the summer and as an animal feeding site during the winter. We conclude that the winter feeding facility managed by respondent/cross-appellant Reichmann Land and Cattle, LLP (“Reich-mann”) is not an “animal feeding operation,” as defined by 40 C.F.R. § 122.23(b)(1) (2014), and therefore Reich-mann need not obtain a national-pollutant-discharge-elimination-system permit (“NPDES permit”). We also conclude that because Reichmann…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Secura Insurance Company v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Marcellino Pena v. Bob KindlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- In the Matter of a Petition for Clarification of an Appropriate Unit Independent School District No. 622, North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale, North St. Paul, Minnesota v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Education Association, North St. Paul, Minnesota, Relator, Bureau of Mediation ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.