Legal Opinion

State v. Mackey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2011No. 20100377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kyle Mackey appeals from a district court order amending his sentence and denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Mackey argues the court’s original sentence was illegal, and he should have been allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because a manifest injustice occurred as a result of the court’s original sentence. We affirm, concluding withdrawal of Mack-ey’s guilty plea is not necessary to correct a manifest injustice.

I

[¶2] Mackey was charged with three counts of gross sexual imposition. The State alleged that between July 1, 2009, and September 4, 2009, Mackey,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KieperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. FarrellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. FeistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. EdwardsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TresenriterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Booth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Mackey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. StromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API