Legal Opinion

State v. Strom

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2019No. 20180167PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶1] Melinda Strom appeals from an amended criminal judgment and order for restitution. Strom argues the district court abused its discretion in awarding restitution because it did not consider her ability to pay as required by N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-08(1). We declare the statute unconstitutional in part and affirm the restitution order and judgment.

I

[¶2] Strom pled guilty to misapplication of entrusted property in excess of $50,000 in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-23-07(1). Strom was sentenced to five years, all suspended for three years of supervised probation. A restitution…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mills v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hoff v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. KieperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Zajac v. Traill County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. McAllisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. McGowenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. PagenkopfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Northwest Landowners Association v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. MichelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API