Legal Opinion

State v. Na'im B.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 12, 2008No. SC 17923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the conviction of the defendant, Na’im B., of one count of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (l). 2 The state appeals, following our grant of certification, 3 from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of risk of injury to a child arising from the defendant’s delay in seeking medical attention for bums suffered by the victim, his four month old son. State v. Na’im B., 101 Conn. App.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. State v. ZayasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. State v. DumlaoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WinfreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. TOMAS D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. State v. Maurice M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API