Legal Opinion

State v. Zayas

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 9, 1985No. 10763PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.

The defendant was convicted by a jury of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-1021 and 53a-49.2 In his appeal the defendant challenges (1) the reopening of the state’s case as an abuse of discretion and as a violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy; (2) the court’s instructions on the intent to commit a *613crime within a dwelling; (3) the instruction on the substantial step element of a criminal attempt; and (4) the sufficiency of the evidence. We find no error.

We consider the defendant’s claims in the factual context of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. CrespoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API