Legal Opinion
State v. TOMAS D.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 1, 2010No. SC 18415PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the state violated the defendant’s rights to compulsory process under both the sixth amendment to the United States constitution, 1 and article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution, 2 when the prosecutor failed to notify him that it had released from subpoena the lead police investigator, who then became temporarily unavailable to testify at the trial. The defendant, Tomas D., appeals 3 from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, convicting him of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- State v. WinfreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. ShermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State of Connecticut v. David N.J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.