Legal Opinion
State v. Dumlao
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 30, 1985No. 2884; 2954PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendants, Paulino and Aurora Dumlao, were charged with the crimes of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3)1 and injury or risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21,2 and were tried together. The jury found each of them not guilty of the charge of assault but convicted them each of injury or risk of injury to a child. The defendants appeal separately from their convictions, claiming in large part that the court erred in admitting certain evidence and that the evidence was insufficient for conviction. We find no error.
The…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. SalzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.