Legal Opinion
State v. Padua
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 29, 2005No. SC 16915; SC 16916PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
This case involves two separate appeals. In the first, the state appeals, upon our grant *142of certification,1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the convictions of the defendants Bethzaida Padua, Wilfredo Cálvente and Miranda Virgilia Cálvente (Miranda Cálvente) of the crimes of conspiracy to sell marijuana within 1500 feet of a public housing project and risk of injury to a child. The state claims that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the defendants’ convictions of risk of iryury to a child because…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.