Legal Opinion

Renfer v. Skaggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1950No. Civ. 17041PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal from an order granting a motion for a new trial. The order reads as follows: “Motion for a new trial, argued and submitted on September 29, 1948, is now by the Court granted. ’ ’

The action is for the recovery of $1,000 paid by plaintiffs to defendant on the purchase price of property hereafter described. The complaint alleged the making of a written contract for the sale by defendant to plaintiffs of a machine shop, its equipment, and the right to use the defendant’s name, priority, and all contracts made by him to the date of the contract, for $3,000. It was alleged that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Will v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Kralyevich v. MagriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Pierce v. NashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Tagney v. HoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Bray v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API