Legal Opinion

Tagney v. Hoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1968No. Civ. 24132PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

—Defendants have appealed from an order granting plaintiffs a new trial, following entry of judgment on a verdict in favor of defendants, in an action in which plaintiffs sought damages for personal injuries on account of the alleged negligence of defendants.

Defendants’ sole ground of appeal is the failure of the trial court.to specify the reason or reasons for granting the new trial as. required by. the provisions of section 657 of the Code of Civil,Pr.o.eedure. as amended in.1965 (Stats. 1965, ch. 1749, § 1, p. 3922). The order.was made “upon.the ground that the evidence was insufficient to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Treber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Meiner v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Lankster v. Alpha Beta Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Gaskill v. Pacific Hospital of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API