Legal Opinion

Will v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1941No. L. A. 17862PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

After a jury had returned a verdict against the respondent railroad company awarding damages for the death of Roy Clayton Will, which occurred in a crossing accident, the trial judge granted a motion for a new trial. The appeal is from that order.

The complaint alleged that the engineer and fireman of the train, who were joined as defendants, negligently drove the engine and cars with great speed and rapidity to and across Chevy Chase Drive without ringing any bell or blowing any whistle. The appellants also charged Southern Pacific Company with negligence in maintaining a crossing having…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Toschi v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Freeman v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Board of Com'rs of Dona Ana County v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API