Legal Opinion

Carver v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8514SC345PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend by this appeal that the trial court erred by granting Roberts’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs apparently concede that the allegations of their complaint were insufficiently particular to allege fraud by misrepresentation, under previous decisions of this court in Terry v. Terry, 302 N.C. 77, 273 S.E. 2d 674 (1981) and Coley v. North Carolina Nat’l Bank, 41 N.C. App. 121, 254 S.E. 2d 217 (1979). They argue, however, that their complaint was sufficient to allege a cause of action for fraudulent concealment of a material defect. We agree.

Fraud may be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Coley v. North Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Brooks v. Ervin Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Stone v. Doctors' Lake Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Becker v. Graber Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Helms v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Everts v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Wilson v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API