Legal Opinion

Coley v. North Carolina National Bank

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1979No. 7819SC672PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff first contends that the court erred in granting the Bank’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Plaintiff argues that the complaint contains sufficiently detailed allegations of fact which, if proven, would establish fraud.

The essential elements of active fraud are well-established: There must be a misrepresentation of material fact, made with knowledge of its falsity and with intent to deceive, which the other party reasonably relies on to his deception and detriment. Equally well-established is the requirement that the plaintiff allege all material facts and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964
  2. Moore v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Hardin v. KCS International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Bob Timberlake Collection, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Robertson v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Carlisle v. KeithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API