Wilson v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRITT, Senior District Judge.
The matter before the court is defendant Dryvit Systems, Inc.’s (“Dryvit”) 15 February 2002 motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have not responded to the motion, and the time within which to do so has expired. Thus, the motion is ripe for disposition.
I. BACKGROUND
On or about 9 June 1995, plaintiffs and third-party defendant NCW Development, Inc. (“NCW”) entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of property and improvements located at 304 Otmoor Lane, Morrisville, North Carolina. See Compl. ¶ 1. Plaintiffs’ house was subsequently built by NCW, who…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Bianca Ellis v. Louisiana-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Lord v. Customized Consulting Specialty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Pugh v. General Terrazzo Supplies, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Selzer v. Brunsell Brothers, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.