Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Ervin Construction Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1960No. 253PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaRkeh, J.

Plaintiffs’ evidence tends to show the following facts: Defendant construction company purchased and developed that certain development known as Markham Village, and particularly Lot 3, Block 22 of Markham Village, a lot known as 2415 Amesbury Avenue. In the spring of 1955 plaintiffs, who are husband and wife and have three children, were anxious to buy a home for immediate occupancy, because the house they rented had been sold, and they had received notice to vacate. They began negotiations with defendant for the purchase of a house and lot in Markham Village. Defendant showed them several…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Clauser v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Smith v. RawlinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Layman v. BinnsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API