Legal Opinion

Helms v. Holland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1996No. COA95-676PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

In the spring of 1990 plaintiffs, who were in the family care facility business, made an offer to purchase a piece of real property for use as a family care facility. Paragraph 6 of the Offer to Purchase and Contract included a hand-written provision which stated, “B. Property must pass state inspection for family care home guidelines.” Paragraph 8 of the Standard Provisions stated, “RECOMMENDATION: Buyer should have any inspections made prior to incurring expenses for closing.” On 4 April 1990, plaintiffs purchased the property for the contract price of $106,900.00. In the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clark v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Minor v. MinorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Clark v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Carver v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Powell v. WoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. Washburn v. Yadkin Valley Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Weaver v. Saint Joseph of the Pines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State Properties, LLC v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API