Legal Opinion
City of Vista v. Fielder
California Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1996No. S046856PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We granted review in this cause to address a question of first impression in California: Under the Eminent Domain Law, which was enacted by section 2 of chapter 1275 of the Statutes of 1975, and codified as title 7 of part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, commencing with section 1230.010, does a provision of a lease that declares that the lease terminates if all the property subject thereto is acquired for public use deprive the lessee of any right he may have to compensation for the taking of his leasehold or other property?
For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Fibreglas Fabricators, Inc. v. KylbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District v. NikodemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Kong v. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- United States v. 1.377 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- City of San Diego v. SobkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.