Cheney v. Mueller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment granting to plaintiffs an easement by implied reservation across defendants’ property.
Plaintiffs’ complaint, after alleging the facts, asked that the deed from plaintiffs to defendants be reformed to include a reference to “existing rights of way for roads”; that defendants be enjoined from blocking the access road to a house subsequently sold by plaintiffs to a Mr. Hansen and “for such other and further relief as to the court seems just and equitable.” Defendants’ answer, in addition to a general denial, also asked for affirmative relief requiring plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cook v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Rose Et Ux. v. Denn Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Eagles Five, LLC v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.