Rose Et Ux. v. Denn Et Ux.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a decree of the Circuit Court which held that the plaintiffs “are the owners and users of an easement and way of necessity, more particularly described as follows, * * *. The defendants and each of them be and they hereby are perpetually restrained and enjoined from in any manner closing or interfering with the use and travel of said easement and way of necessity by the plaintiffs * * V’ The easement and way of necessity sustained by the challenged decree extends across a tract of land which is owned by the defendants-appellants, Henry Denn and Nora…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Ford v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Beck v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Tucker v. NudingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Brown v. KempOregon Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Cheney v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.