Legal Opinion

Klepac v. Fendley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1931No. 1 Div. 584PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is a statutory action for recovery of land. There was no demurrer to the complaint, but defendant pleaded not guilty, and thereby admitted possession of the land as described in the complaint.

The court gave the general charge for plaintiff. Defendant having sued out this appeal contends that the court erred in admitting in evidence a deed to plaintiff with the same description as that in the complaint, and in giving the affirmative charge for plaintiff. The court admitted parol evidence in aid of the description in the deed. Unless that description is void, as a matter of law, in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nolen v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Bradford v. SneedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. East v. KarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Lessley v. PraterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Martin v. BainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alford v. RodgersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Limbaugh v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Blackwell v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Wood v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Hughes v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API