Legal Opinion
East v. Karter
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 17, 1926No. 6 Div. 596PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Appellee filed his bill for the sale and partition of three certain lots in the city of Cullman. By their cross-bill appellants interposed their claim of ownership of the entire fee. The court sustained ap-pellee’s demurrer to the cross-bill, and the cross-complainants have appealed.
The instrument in the form of a conveyance under which appellants claim title describes the lots in controversy as follows:
“Part of lot No. 353 being 29' 3"xl32; part of lot No. 494 being 104x132; part of lot No. 492 being 165x132.
“On part of lot No. 353 there is a mortgage in favor of the Improved Building & Loan…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Meyer Bros. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Jenkins v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Thrasher v. RoysterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Tierney v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Karter v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Ben Cheeseman Realty Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- King v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Klepac v. FendleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Martin v. BainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.