Legal Opinion

Alford v. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1942No. 3 Div. 349PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question of legal importance in this case may be thus stated and explained. Plaintiff, suing to recover a small plot of land approximately two acres, asserts title acquired by adverse possession for the prescription period of twenty years without color of title, claim of purchase or inheritance, or other condition required by Title 7, section 828, Code of 1940, but upon the mistaken assumption that it was a part of a tract which he had bought and occupied throughout those years. He sold, conveyed and surrendered possession of the land according to the description by which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Humphreys v. McKissockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Woodhull v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Jones v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  5. Hopkins v. DuggarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fitts v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. McNeil v. HaddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Salter v. HamiterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Meyer v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API